![]() ![]() I will also admit that some effects are cool. Okay, I would agree that it's pretty cool to create Polaroid-like images easily without having to worry about the cost of the films. ![]() So instead of barking up negative on this tree, why not keep to the positive that this program could revitalize interest in the real film. I have 4 real polaroid cameras that I have not been able to buy picture cartridges for some time (1 of which is actually my first digital photo printer for my computer-gasp real polaroids from digital pictures how scandalous) and I have 1 camera that the cost of the film and availability makes it nearly impossible to use, I have 3 digi cameras however that I can enjoy taking pictures from any day of the week and I can run thru poladroid and get the same image I would have scanned. IN REAL TIME a real polaroid will have significant value as a result of its physical properties, but in the digital world, it has (And always has had) less value then ANY picture who's source is digital if for no other reason then the fact it is a film being scanned, etc. The reality is, the only chance instant films have a chance of surviving is increased interest on the part of the public, that said, I think it is an uphill battle as the world has shifted to digital so widely. kkudos again - will drop some $ soon - félicitations !īoth of you sound like sour grapes. NUMBER PRESS NILOBJECTEXCEPTION DIALOG BOX FREEOh and feel free to use my samples for your purposes - I think that one would be good: Īnyhow. much simpler if you could provide the appropriate app with a few writing styles. As it is, the standard methods only give straight lined typed words. Lastly an app to approximate a handwritten note would be a GREAT addition to this program. NUMBER PRESS NILOBJECTEXCEPTION DIALOG BOX HOW TOdunno how to address that besides learning a bit more of photoshop Then when I do tweak there is the problem of getting the white frame back to an appropriate color. A photoshop shortcut/ recipe/ pointers that would preserve the look would be great THIRD: sometimes I find I would like to tweak the final result somewhat. Don't want to know the secret sauce, after all the competition might steal it. I am a mazed at the good taste of the algorithm logic. Second: kudos specifically for however you figure out how to crop for square. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |